Pretend

Once upon a time there was a people who fed on imagination. God gave them the gift of perceiving reality.  God gave them the strength to resist being mired down by the difficulties of the day.  This people drew from the Well of Creativity and invented and improvised and immersed themselves in all “the possibilities” imagination could inspire.

The Adversary hated this flourish of resemblance to the Sovereign of the Universe, so he set into motion a scheme to destroy imagination.  From his trunk of untruth he withdrew a powerful and insidious weapon.  It is called Pretend.

Pretend should be a beloved child of imagination, but like many children, Pretend grew up to be an ugly, rebellious and violent adult.  Rather than take its place as the respectful subservient, Pretend forcefully supplanted the immeasurable possibility.  Like a voracious weed, Pretend took over the garden of the human mind.

The calendar tells us that it is the Holiday Season.  Does anyone recall that “holiday” means a period of exemption or relief?  Only a very few!  Instead we bow low to the god of Pretend.  We pretend to be happy, we pretend to have money, we pretend to experience wonder, we pretend to love (or at least care for) each other, we pretend to be generous, we pretend to have time.  We work diligently, fervently, passionately for Pretend.  The color of imagination dims day by day under the glaring glitz of all our activity.

Is this Peace on Earth?  Good will to those whom God favors?

This season is the Season of Advent.  Expectation of celebrating the arrival of the gift of Love and the return of the King.  My family at Main Street will together imagine the great possibilities of excusing Pretend.

    God’s voice is glorious in the thunder.
We can’t even imagine the greatness of his power.

–Job 37.5, NLT

Unknown's avatar

About Robert Franklin

Father to six (three boys and three girls, three from the USA and three from Uganda) Husband to one (and intent on staying that way!) Son to Jesus-freak parents. Brother to three great people. Weak, sinful, enemy of God rescued for adoption by grace through faith.
This entry was posted in Bible Study. Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to Pretend

  1. hcombs's avatar hcombs says:

    Appreciate the posting……interesting.Always read your blog…….thks HC

  2. Jeff Herron's avatar Jeff Herron says:

    Just reading Hebrews 3 last night, and this resonated with what you posted here:

    “12 See to it, brothers and sisters, that none of you has a sinful, unbelieving heart that turns away from the living God. 13 But encourage one another daily, as long as it is called “Today,” so that none of you may be hardened by sin’s deceitfulness. 14 We have come to share in Christ, if indeed we hold our original conviction firmly to the very end.”

    Looking forward to sharing in Christ with my brothers and sisters at Main Street and taking part in some mutual encouragement!

  3. Carol Howard's avatar Carol Howard says:

    Pastor Bob, in Sunday morning’s message you mentioned that Caiphas was Annas’ son, I thought he was his son-in-law. I’ve tried to research it on line but can’t find the relationship mentioned. Can you please direct me to a site? I hope you don’t think I’m nit-picking, I’m just somewhat of a history nut! Carol

    • Good catch, I am impressed! The actual relationship between Annas and Caiaphas is unknown for certain, but John 18.13 is translated “son-in-law.” I used the term “son” as a generic to cover the bases so to speak. Here is an excerpt from the well respected Anchor Bible Dictionary about the relationship between the two men.

      Because the office was not jointly held, the statement constitutes a puzzle, and one which is complicated by the close relationship between Annas and Caiaphas, as documented by Josephus. Ant 18.2.2; 18.4.3 has it that Joseph Caiaphas was appointed high priest around the year 18 by Valerius Gratus and removed from office around the year 36 by Vitellius. Annas was appointed by Quirinius around A.D. 6 and deposed by Valerius Gratus in A.D. 15 (Ant 18.2.1, 2). Luke 3:2, and especially Acts 4:6, therefore appear to confuse two quite distinct high priesthoods. S. Sandmel has in fact argued that Luke-Acts mistakenly recognizes only Annas as high priest, and that a careless use of sources caused the name of Caiaphas to intrude (Sandmel, IDB 1: 482). But the close relationship between Annas and Caiaphas has simply not been taken into account by Sandmel: Annas’ influence survived far beyond his high priesthood, in that five of his sons were to serve in the office (Ant 20.9.1), and Caiaphas was perhaps his son-in-law (John 18:13).

      So you are correct. To the best of our knowledge the relationship is by marriage, so son-in-law would have been more accurate.

      Freedman, D. N. (1996). Vol. 1: The Anchor Yale Bible Dictionary (804). New York: Doubleday.

Leave a comment